Predictors of Catastrophic Adverse Outcomes in Children With Pulmonary Hypertension Undergoing Cardiac Catheterization: A Multi-Institutional Analysis From the Pediatric Health Information Systems Database | SCAI
Dec 6th 2021

Predictors of Catastrophic Adverse Outcomes in Children With Pulmonary Hypertension Undergoing Cardiac Catheterization: A Multi-Institutional Analysis From the Pediatric Health Information Systems Database

Published September 15th 2015, the purpose of this study was to identify risk factors for catastrophic adverse outcomes in children with PH undergoing cardiac catheterization. 

The authors used the PHIS database to review catastrophic adverse outcomes of either death and/or the initiation of mechanical circulatory support within one day of cardiac catheterization in 4,401 patients (6,339 procedures) with a diagnosis of Pulmonary Hypertension from 38 centers.

Patients were aged 0–21 years, and the timeframe of the catheterizations was January 2007–December 2012. The percentage of patients in etiologic groups were:

  • Idiopathic PAH (21%)
  • Associated PAH with CHD (69%)
  • PAH with cardiomyopathy (6%)
  • PAH s/p Transplant (4%)
  • CTEPH (1%).

The review excluded patients who were already on ECMO at the time of cath.

Mechanical support was used within one day in 206 patients (3.3%), and 17 (0.3%) patients died. The risk of death before discharge was 6.6% (n = 416), with an increased risk of death if placed on mechanical support within one day of cath (15.1%).

Multivariate modeling showed an adjusted risk of 3.3% of the composite risk.

Independent predictors of adverse outcomes were: 

  • Younger age
  • Cardiac operation in the same admission
  • Pre-procedural systemic vasodilator infusion
  • Hemodialysis.

Pre-procedure use of pulmonary vasodilators was associated with reduced risk of composite outcomes.

A secondary analysis identified an association between center volume and the risk of early catastrophic adverse effects.

The transcatheter intervention was associated with a lower risk of the negative outcome; this may have been a selection bias for choosing not to intervene in sicker patients or indicated a reversible anatomic issue from successful treatment.

All editors: B. Rush Waller, III, MD